When someone dies, social norms often dictate silence out of respect, allowing space for grief regardless of the person’s past. But gymnast Simone Biles recently challenged that idea, sparking widespread debate. Days after conservative commentator Charlie Kirk died, Biles published a blog post reflecting on the impact of his harsh criticism during her career. The timing surprised many—some praised her honesty, while others questioned whether speaking out so soon was appropriate.

Biles revisited the 2021 Tokyo Olympics, when she withdrew from several events after experiencing the “twisties,” a dangerous mental block that put her safety at risk. By prioritizing her mental health, she drew both support and criticism. Kirk was among her most vocal detractors, calling her decision unpatriotic and weak.

In her blog, Biles described the lasting pain of those attacks, emphasizing how deeply they affected her. By sharing her perspective now, she reignited conversations about mental health, resilience, and how society treats vulnerability—especially in high-profile athletes.

Reactions have been mixed. Some see her statement as an empowering act of reclaiming her story and standing up for mental health advocacy. Others view it as poorly timed, believing that criticizing the dead breaches etiquette. Ultimately, Biles’s choice highlights a cultural shift—where silence is no longer seen as the only way to cope with pain or injustice.