When the stadium fell quiet ahead of kickoff at this year’s Super Bowl, millions of viewers expected a respectful, emotional moment as the national anthem began. Charlie Puth stepped onto the field and delivered a polished, confident rendition—but almost immediately, social media lit up with a very different reaction. What was meant to be a unifying pregame moment quickly turned into a viral debate that followed the performance long after the final note faded.

The anthem was performed ahead of Super Bowl LX, held at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, where the New England Patriots faced off against the Seattle Seahawks. Music had already been a major talking point leading into the game, with controversy surrounding the halftime show and speculation about messages during the pregame entertainment. Against that backdrop, Puth’s anthem performance was always going to be closely scrutinized.

Although many viewers praised the singer’s control and tone, others questioned whether the performance was live. Online comments began circulating within minutes, with some users claiming the vocals sounded “too perfect” and suggesting the anthem may have been pre-recorded. Accusations of lip-syncing quickly spread across social platforms, fueled by comparisons to past Super Bowl performances where technical issues or visible imperfections confirmed singers were performing live.

No official confirmation has been given either way, and it’s unlikely the debate will ever be settled definitively. What’s clear, however, is how quickly moments at events of this scale are dissected in real time. Whether viewers heard professionalism or perfection that seemed suspicious, the conversation once again proved that at the Super Bowl, even the opening anthem can become one of the night’s most talked-about moments.